ABSTRACT
Background: Septic shock, defined as organ dysfunction caused by a dysregulated host response to infection, is a condition associated with high morbidity and mortality. One of the hallmarks of sepsis is the excessive release of cytokines and other inflammatory mediators that cause septic shock and multi-organ failure (MOF). New adsorbents are now available as adjuvant therapy aimed at modulating the cytokine "storm" in sepsis. They are thought to be useful if adopted early (within 8-24 hours of the diagnosis of septic shock) in patients who are unresponsive to standard therapy. Here we report our experience with CytoSorb. Method(s): From January 2021 to May 2022, 46 patients with septic shock were treated with continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) associated with hemoadsorption with CytoSorb. All cases presented organ failure including AKI. Surgical patients (n = 13) were treated with surgery, COVID patients (n = 15) and medical patients (n = 16) with medical therapy;all surgery cases were operated on before starting the haemadsorption and in some cases reoperation with the need to suspend the adsorption. The mean age was 69 +/- 17 years (SD). On admission the mean SAPSII score was 50 +/- 11 (SD). CRRT as hemodiafiltration (CVVHDF) was performed. All patients received at least one CytoSorb treatment and additional treatments (up to 21 filters in a Covid patient) according to our indication. The CytoSorb cartridge was installed in series to the high cut-off filter;blood flow rates were maintained between 120 and 150 mL/min while dialysis doses from 18 to 45 mL/kg/hour. CytoSorb was renewed every 24 hours. We evaluated the impact of CytoSorb on 30-day survival, haemodynamics and relevant outcomes. Result(s): The 30-day survival was 30%. During treatment with CytoSorb, patients had a hemodynamic stabilization with a significant improvement in MAP, a reduction in amines and a decrease in PCR and PCT (Figure 1). Mortality at 30 days among medical patients was almost comparable to that of COVID patients and higher than that of surgical patients (70%, 69% and 61%, respectively). It should be noted that almost half of the deceased patients arrived late in the hospital, thus leading to a late start of treatment. Conclusion(s): We confirm the efficacy and usefulness of the CytoSorb if adopted early in patients who do not respond to standard therapy. CytoSorb treatment was safe and well tolerated with no device-related adverse events during or after treatment sessions.